What type of review is available to any person affected by a final order from the commission after a hearing?

Judicial review is the correct response because it refers to the process through which an affected individual can challenge a final order issued by a commission in a court of law. This review allows parties to question the validity of the commission's decision based on potential legal errors. It is a critical component of administrative law, ensuring that decisions made by administrative agencies are in line with statutory authority and procedural fairness.

Judicial review provides an essential check on the power of administrative agencies, allowing individuals to seek recourse in the judicial system if they believe their rights have been violated or if they contest the legality of the agency's actions. This right to contest outcomes adds a layer of accountability and allows for interpretation and application of law by the courts.

Alternatives such as administrative review typically refer to re-evaluation processes within the agency itself, while peer review and public review do not encompass formal judicial processes for disputing final orders.