What is entitled to any person affected by a decision made by the commission after a hearing?

Judicial review is the correct answer because it refers to the legal right of individuals to challenge decisions made by governmental bodies, including commissions, in a court of law. When a person feels adversely affected by a commission's decision following a hearing, they can seek judicial review to have that decision evaluated for legality and appropriateness. This process ensures that the rights of individuals are protected under the law and provides a mechanism for oversight of administrative actions.

This option is distinct because it specifically relates to legal proceedings where an affected party can ask a court to review the decision, while the other options either do not apply in the context of commission hearings or imply actions that are not typically available after such decisions. For instance, monetary compensation might not be a direct remedy available from a commission decision, and automatic reinstatement usually doesn't apply unless explicitly stated in a ruling. Similarly, appealing to the governor is not a standard legal process for contesting commission decisions. Thus, judicial review serves as a foundational legal right to ensure accountability and fairness in administrative decisions.